Kehl v. Davmar Corp.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Kehl v. Davmar Corp.

195 A.2d 266, 1963 D.C. App. LEXIS 314

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 1963·No. No. 3327·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was a suit for damages brought by appellant, a tenant at sufferance, against the landlord and a cotenant. Appellant claimed that the cotenant’s excessive noise constituted a breach of her right of privacy and that the landlord’s failure to control the cotenant resulted in a breach of her implied covenant of quiet enjoyment. At the close of appellant’s case the trial judge directed a verdict for appellees.

We have carefully reviewed the record and find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This was a suit for damages brought by appellant, a tenant at sufferance, against the landlord and a cotenant. Appellant claimed that the cotenant’s excessive noise constituted a breach of her right of privacy and that the landlord’s failure to control the cotenant resulted in a breach of her implied covenant of quiet enjoyment. At the close of appellant’s case the trial judge directed a verdict for appellees.

We have carefully reviewed the record and find no error.

Affirmed.

Kehl v. Davmar Corp., 195 A.2d 266, 1963 D.C. App. LEXIS 314 (D.C. 1963).

Pincite

195 A.2d 266 (Kehl v. Davmar Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.