Kegwin v. Campbell
1 Root 268
This text of 1 Root 268 (Kegwin v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kegwin v. Campbell, 1 Root 268 (Colo. 1791).
Opinion
Action of trespass committed on land. Plea — That Joseph Campbell, one of the defendants, was seized and possessed in fee of the land on which, etc. This being traversed, the jury found that the defendant was not seized, etc. On motion in arrest, because said verdict had not answered the issue, judgment was arrested and a repleader ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Day v. Webb
28 Conn. 140 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1859)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kegwin-v-campbell-conn-1791.