Keeton v. State

264 S.W.2d 737, 159 Tex. Crim. 431, 1954 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2314
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 17, 1954
DocketNo. 26,833
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 264 S.W.2d 737 (Keeton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keeton v. State, 264 S.W.2d 737, 159 Tex. Crim. 431, 1954 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2314 (Tex. 1954).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for selling whisky in a dry area; the punishment, thirty days in jail.

The information charges only that appellant did, in a dry area, "sell whiskey.”

The name of the alleged purchaser is not stated, nor is there an allegation that the purchaser was unknown.

Such an information is fatally defective. Barnett v. State, 156 Tex. Cr. R. 396, 242 S. W. 2d 885; Wilson v. State, 242 S. W. 2d 886; Arts. 406 and 416, C. C. P.

The information being fatally defective, a conviction may not be predicated thereon.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bruce v. State
622 S.W.2d 624 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1981)
Laury v. State
508 S.W.2d 856 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Threadgill v. State
292 S.W.2d 121 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)
Treadgill v. State
292 S.W.2d 121 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)
King v. State
286 S.W.2d 422 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 S.W.2d 737, 159 Tex. Crim. 431, 1954 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keeton-v-state-texcrimapp-1954.