Keeter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Keeter v. State

1919 OK CR 244, 182 P. 732, 16 Okla. Crim. 696, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 12, 1919

DocketNo. A-3238.

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 244 (Keeter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keeter v. State, 1919 OK CR 244, 182 P. 732, 16 Okla. Crim. 696, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been pending in this court since the 9th day of January, 191S. On the. 3d day of June, .1919, the case was called for submission. No appearance was made at that time by counsel representing plaintiff in error to orally argue the cause, nor has any brief been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error. At the time the cause was submitted, the Attorney General filed a motion to affirm the same for failure to diligently prosecute the appeal.

It is apparent that this appeal has been abandoned, as several extensions of time were granted to counsel for plaintiff in error for the purpose of briefing the cause, but no brief has been filed.

The motion of the Attorney General to affirm the judgment for failure to diligently prosecute the appeal is sustained, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been pending in this court since the 9th day of January, 191S. On the. 3d day of June, .1919, the case was called for submission. No appearance was made at that time by counsel representing plaintiff in error to orally argue the cause, nor has any brief been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error. At the time the cause was submitted, the Attorney General filed a motion to affirm the same for failure to diligently prosecute the appeal.

It is apparent that this appeal has been abandoned, as several extensions of time were granted to counsel for plaintiff in error for the purpose of briefing the cause, but no brief has been filed.

The motion of the Attorney General to affirm the judgment for failure to diligently prosecute the appeal is sustained, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK CR 244, 182 P. 732, 16 Okla. Crim. 696, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keeter-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.