Keeter v. Keeter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Keeter v. Keeter

936 So. 2d 1209, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14812, 2006 WL 2527192

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 2006·No. No. 1D05-2908·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant argues that the final summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of appellees should be reversed because of disputed issues of fact. We agree that there is a disputed issue of fact whether appellant fulfilled the obligations required by the Agreement for Deed at issue in the case. Therefore, we REVERSE and REMAND for a trial.

ALLEN, DAVIS, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant argues that the final summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of appellees should be reversed because of disputed issues of fact. We agree that there is a disputed issue of fact whether appellant fulfilled the obligations required by the Agreement for Deed at issue in the case. Therefore, we REVERSE and REMAND for a trial.

ALLEN, DAVIS, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Keeter v. Keeter, 936 So. 2d 1209, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14812, 2006 WL 2527192 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

936 So. 2d 1209 (Keeter v. Keeter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.