Keet v. Murrin
235 A.D. 882
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except MeNamee, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial on the ground that the admission of the evidence that the defendant “ settled ” with a witness, who had a corresponding claim against the defendant, was erroneous and prejudicial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Keet v. Murrin, 235 A.D. 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
235 A.D. 882 (Keet v. Murrin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Coral Gables v. Jordan
186 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Schenker v. Bourne
278 A.D. 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Cavalier v. Bittner
186 Misc. 848 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
Woodland v. Cote
252 A.D. 254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Goldstein v. Albany Yellow Cab Co.
249 A.D. 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)