Keet v. Murrin
235 A.D. 882
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 235 A.D. 882 (Keet v. Murrin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Keet v. Murrin, 235 A.D. 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except MeNamee, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial on the ground that the admission of the evidence that the defendant “ settled ” with a witness, who had a corresponding claim against the defendant, was erroneous and prejudicial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Coral Gables v. Jordan
186 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Schenker v. Bourne
278 A.D. 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Cavalier v. Bittner
186 Misc. 848 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
Woodland v. Cote
252 A.D. 254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Goldstein v. Albany Yellow Cab Co.
249 A.D. 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keet-v-murrin-nyappdiv-1932.