Keester v. Keester

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Keester v. Keester

765 So. 2d 140, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7592, 2000 WL 1292715

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 22, 2000·No. No. 1D99-2743·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the final judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage except, as the former husband concedes, the computation of the former wife’s one-half interest in the former husband’s savings and retirement benefits should be based on the date the parties separated in June 1998, not on February 21, 1998, as indicated in the final judgment. We remand the case for a correction of the wife’s interest in the savings and retirement benefits. In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed.

DAVIS, BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the final judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage except, as the former husband concedes, the computation of the former wife’s one-half interest in the former husband’s savings and retirement benefits should be based on the date the parties separated in June 1998, not on February 21, 1998, as indicated in the final judgment. We remand the case for a correction of the wife’s interest in the savings and retirement benefits. In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed.

DAVIS, BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Keester v. Keester, 765 So. 2d 140, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7592, 2000 WL 1292715 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

765 So. 2d 140 (Keester v. Keester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.