Keesee ex rel. Bowdre Bros. & Co. v. Sloan
69 Miss. 369
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The purchaser was entitled to the rent of the land purchased, which became due after his purchase, and the fact that the claim for rent had been transferred did not defeat his right. 12 Am. & Eng. Enc. L., 1035; Martin v. Martin, 7 Md., 368; Sampson v. Grimes,7 Blackf., 176; Westmoreland v. Foster, 60 Ala., 448; English v. Key, 39 Ib., 113; Stout v. Kean, 3 Harr. (Del.), 82; Wilson v. Delaplaine, 3 Ib., 499.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Keesee ex rel. Bowdre Bros. & Co. v. Sloan, 69 Miss. 369 (Mich. 1891).
69 Miss. 369 (Keesee ex rel. Bowdre Bros. & Co. v. Sloan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Equitable Life Insurance v. Bowman
32 S.W.2d 126 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1930)
Joiner v. Leflore Grocer Co.
110 So. 857 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1926)
Roberts v. Armstrong
212 S.W. 227 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Armstrong v. Gifford
196 S.W. 723 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)