Keesee ex rel. Bowdre Bros. & Co. v. Sloan

Mississippi Supreme Court

Keesee ex rel. Bowdre Bros. & Co. v. Sloan

69 Miss. 369

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1891

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 69 Miss. 369 (Keesee ex rel. Bowdre Bros. & Co. v. Sloan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keesee ex rel. Bowdre Bros. & Co. v. Sloan, 69 Miss. 369 (Mich. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The purchaser was entitled to the rent of the land purchased, which became due after his purchase, and the fact that the claim for rent had been transferred did not defeat his right. 12 Am. & Eng. Enc. L., 1035; Martin v. Martin, 7 Md., 368; Sampson v. Grimes,7 Blackf., 176; Westmoreland v. Foster, 60 Ala., 448; English v. Key, 39 Ib., 113; Stout v. Kean, 3 Harr. (Del.), 82; Wilson v. Delaplaine, 3 Ib., 499.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The purchaser was entitled to the rent of the land purchased, which became due after his purchase, and the fact that the claim for rent had been transferred did not defeat his right. 12 Am. & Eng. Enc. L., 1035; Martin v. Martin, 7 Md., 368; Sampson v. Grimes,7 Blackf., 176; Westmoreland v. Foster, 60 Ala., 448; English v. Key, 39 Ib., 113; Stout v. Kean, 3 Harr. (Del.), 82; Wilson v. Delaplaine, 3 Ib., 499.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 Miss. 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keesee-ex-rel-bowdre-bros-co-v-sloan-miss-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack