Keerins v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Keerins v. Oregon State Penitentiary

753 P.2d 960, 91 Or. App. 180

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 11, 1988

Docket07-87-169; CA A45249

StatusPublished

This text of 753 P.2d 960 (Keerins v. Oregon State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keerins v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 753 P.2d 960, 91 Or. App. 180 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary. He contends that his right to due process of law was violated because he was not fully informed regarding the applicable law when he admitted violating an institution disciplinary rule. There is no merit to that contention. He also argues that the fine imposed is invalid. It is. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary. He contends that his right to due process of law was violated because he was not fully informed regarding the applicable law when he admitted violating an institution disciplinary rule. There is no merit to that contention. He also argues that the fine imposed is invalid. It is. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

753 P.2d 960, 91 Or. App. 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keerins-v-oregon-state-penitentiary-orctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack