Keerans v. . Keerans

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Keerans v. . Keerans

13 S.E. 895, 109 N.C. 101

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 5, 1891

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 S.E. 895 (Keerans v. . Keerans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keerans v. . Keerans, 13 S.E. 895, 109 N.C. 101 (N.C. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Clark, J.:

This is an application for a writ of certiorari, filed April 25th, 1890, and continued for the petitioner, from time to time, till the present term. Rule 43 prescribes that no petition for certiorari shall be heard “ unless the petitioner shall have given the adverse party ten days notice in writing.” No counsel has, at any time, represented the adverse party in this Court, and there is nothing to indicate that notice has been given, as required by the rule. The application must, therefore, be refused.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark, J.:

This is an application for a writ of certiorari, filed April 25th, 1890, and continued for the petitioner, from time to time, till the present term. Rule 43 prescribes that no petition for certiorari shall be heard “ unless the petitioner shall have given the adverse party ten days notice in writing.” No counsel has, at any time, represented the adverse party in this Court, and there is nothing to indicate that notice has been given, as required by the rule. The application must, therefore, be refused.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 S.E. 895, 109 N.C. 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keerans-v-keerans-nc-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack