Keepnews Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Keepnews Co. v. United States

48 Cust. Ct. 486

United States Customs Court·Decided June 18, 1962·No. No. 66866; protest 326728-K (New York)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise described on the invoice as items 122 and 123 consists of vases with covers and that said vases are copies or replicas of original productions, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. United States v. Baumgarten & Co. (2 Ct. Cust. Appls. 321, T.D. 32052); Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458); F. Lunning, Inc., et al. v. United States (39 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 1941); and Abstract 62694, followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise described on the invoice as items 122 and 123 consists of vases with covers and that said vases are copies or replicas of original productions, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. United States v. Baumgarten & Co. (2 Ct. Cust. Appls. 321, T.D. 32052); Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458); F. Lunning, Inc., et al. v. United States (39 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 1941); and Abstract 62694, followed.

Keepnews Co. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 486 (cusc 1962).

Pincite

48 Cust. Ct. 486 (Keepnews Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related