Keep v. . Kaufman

56 N.Y. 332, 1874 N.Y. LEXIS 124
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 14, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 56 N.Y. 332 (Keep v. . Kaufman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keep v. . Kaufman, 56 N.Y. 332, 1874 N.Y. LEXIS 124 (N.Y. 1874).

Opinion

The plaintiff, instead of availing himself of the leave granted by the General Term to amend his complaint, has appealed to this court, thus risking his case upon a mere question of pleading. The point involved is purely technical, and must be decided without reference to any considerations other than the rules of pleading. Though few of these remain in force, one still exists which is, that causes of action in tort and in contract cannot be joined. If there be any exception to this rule, it must spring out of the first subdivision of section 167 of the Code, which permits the joinder of several causes of action, legal or equitable, when they all arise out of the same transaction, or transactions connected *Page 334 with the same subject of action. Without entering into an extended discussion upon the subject, we deem it sufficient to say that, in our judgment, the case at bar does not fall within the exception. The first count of the complaint is for the breach of a covenant of quiet enjoyment contained in a lease. The fifth count is for entering the apartments of the plaintiff with false keys, breaking open his trunks, and maliciously and feloniously removing and injuring his property. We think that the Superior Court correctly decided that this departure from the rules of pleading, which were well settled before the adoption of the Code, is not sanctioned by section 167.

The judgment should be affirmed with costs.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ader v. Blau
148 N.E. 771 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)
Walser v. Moran
173 P. 1149 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1918)
O'Rourke v. Cunard Steamship Co.
169 A.D. 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Hills v. McKane
71 Misc. 581 (New York Supreme Court, 1911)
Drexel v. Hollander
112 A.D. 25 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Emerson v. Nash
70 L.R.A. 326 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1905)
Zeiser v. Cohn
44 Misc. 462 (New York Supreme Court, 1904)
McClure v. Wilson
13 A.D. 274 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Corcoran v. Mannering
10 A.D. 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Hannahs v. Hammond
19 N.Y.S. 883 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)
Weeks v. Keteltas
13 Daly 559 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1886)
Raynor v. Brennan
47 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 60 (New York Supreme Court, 1886)
Taylor v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
20 Jones & S. 299 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1885)
Teall v. City of Syracuse
39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 332 (New York Supreme Court, 1884)
Thompson v. St. Nicholas National Bank
61 How. Pr. 163 (New York Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 N.Y. 332, 1874 N.Y. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keep-v-kaufman-ny-1874.