Keeney v. Newton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Keeney v. Newton

236 A.D. 750

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D. 750 (Keeney v. Newton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keeney v. Newton, 236 A.D. 750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Hinman, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for a new trial on the ground of prejudicial errors in the charge, in which the jury were told several times that the plaintiff’s intestate was entitled to the right of way instead of leaving that question to the jury to determine in accordance with a proper statement of the law. MeNamee, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Hinman, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for a new trial on the ground of prejudicial errors in the charge, in which the jury were told several times that the plaintiff’s intestate was entitled to the right of way instead of leaving that question to the jury to determine in accordance with a proper statement of the law. MeNamee, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D. 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keeney-v-newton-nyappdiv-1932.