Keener v. Graham County Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Keener v. Graham County Lumber Co.

96 S.E. 31, 175 N.C. 701, 1918 N.C. LEXIS 139

DecidedMay 28, 1918

StatusPublished

This text of 96 S.E. 31 (Keener v. Graham County Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keener v. Graham County Lumber Co., 96 S.E. 31, 175 N.C. 701, 1918 N.C. LEXIS 139 (N.C. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Peb Oubiam :

Action for damage by loss of logs. The case is exactly like Sumner v. same defendant, decided at this term. The plaintiff did not propose to contradict, add to or vary tbe written contract, but to show a later and fresh agreement as to how the logs should be delivered. The two eases are not distinguishable, and the controlling principles are stated in the Sumner case, with the authorities sustaining them, and there was no error upon the issue as to the damages.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peb Oubiam :

Action for damage by loss of logs. The case is exactly like Sumner v. same defendant, decided at this term. The plaintiff did not propose to contradict, add to or vary tbe written contract, but to show a later and fresh agreement as to how the logs should be delivered. The two eases are not distinguishable, and the controlling principles are stated in the Sumner case, with the authorities sustaining them, and there was no error upon the issue as to the damages.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 S.E. 31, 175 N.C. 701, 1918 N.C. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keener-v-graham-county-lumber-co-nc-1918.