Keene v. Ware

143 So. 611, 106 Fla. 453
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 9, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 143 So. 611 (Keene v. Ware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keene v. Ware, 143 So. 611, 106 Fla. 453 (Fla. 1932).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This appeal is from a decree dismissing a bill of complaint seeking to restrain the levy of taxes for bond service in the City of Clermont. The levy is resisted because it is alleged to be confiscatory and in violation of Section Ten of Article Nine, Constitution of Florida. ,

Even if not barred by laches the bill was properly dismissed 'because of insufficient allegations and showing to enable this Court to consider and properly adjudicate either one of these questions.

In this situation the decree below must be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur. Ellis, J., dissents. Brown, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 So. 611, 106 Fla. 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keene-v-ware-fla-1932.