Keene v. Santos

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJune 9, 2017
Docket70913
StatusUnpublished

This text of Keene v. Santos (Keene v. Santos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keene v. Santos, (Neb. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOSHUA KEENE, No. 70913 Appellant, vs. 9 ) JACQUELINE SANTOS, ki L4‘4 ' t:J Respondent. JUN 09 2017 C!

BY

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 71E.1.43r?(Tili cTC

This is an appeal from a• district court's minute order awarding attorney fees. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mathew. Harter, Judge. This court previously entered an order to show cause directing appellant to demonstrate this court's jurisdiction because we have long held that a minute order is not an appealable order. Rust v. Clark Cty. School District, 103 Nev. 686, 689, 747 P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987). Appellant has responded to our order and argues that because the minute order was issued by the district court judge and notice of entry was filed and served on the parties by the clerk, and because respondent has been able to initiate executing on the judgment, that the minute order should serve as an appealable final order. Respondent has not filed a response. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction. An oral ruling of this nature, even if it is recorded in the minutes, only becomes effective for the purpose of allowing an appeal to be taken once it has been memorialized in a signed, written, file-stamped order. See id.; see also Div. of Child & Family Servs., Dep't of Human Res. u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 454, 92 13 ..3c1 1239, 1245 (2004). The fact that the district court filed the notice of entry of the minutes that it served upon the parties does SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A <-111740 17-:(91(0, not change our analysis of this matter—as we have repeatedly held that only a signed, written, file-stamped order may be appealed. See Rust, 103 Nev. at 689, 747 P.2d at 1382; see also Div. of Child Si Family Servs, 120 Nev. at 454, 92 P.3d at 1245. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

J. Douglas

J.

cc: Hon. Mathew Harter, District Judge M. Nelson Segel, Settlement Judge Nehme-Tomalka & Associates Black & LoBello Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(01 1947A ce 2

gaL■e!

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Keene v. Santos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keene-v-santos-nev-2017.