Keene Corp. v. Bahl

476 So. 2d 789, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2364, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16426
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 17, 1985
DocketNo. BE-141
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 476 So. 2d 789 (Keene Corp. v. Bahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keene Corp. v. Bahl, 476 So. 2d 789, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2364, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16426 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

NIMMONS, Judge.

The employer and carrier appeal from an order awarding compensation benefits to the claimant because of an occupational disease known as “pleural mesothelioma” which resulted from the claimant’s exposure to asbestos particles.

This 57 year old claimant worked around and was exposed to asbestos particles from 1953 through 1972. He was employed by Keene Corporation in 1966 and continued in that firm’s employment through 1972. He became symptomatic in January 1984 and was diagnosed in March 1984 as having malignant pleural mesothelioma.

There is competent substantial evidence supporting the deputy commissioner’s finding that the claimant’s illness was an occupational disease within the meaning of Section 440.151, Florida Statutes1 and that claimant’s exposure to asbestos while employed by Keene from 1966 through 1972 was a contributing factor in causing his illness.

Although the claimant was exposed to asbestos for thirteen years prior to his employment with Keene in 1966, the evidence shows that he was in the employ of Keene when he was last injuriously exposed to asbestos. Exposure during claimant’s prior employment is no defense herein.2

[791]*791The employer/carrier also contends that the limitations period provided for in Section 440.-151(l)(a) bars the claimant’s claim because the disease did not result within 350 weeks after claimant’s last exposure.3 We reject that contention since a fair reading of the statute indicates that the 350-week period is applicable only to death claims.

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER, J., and McCORD, GUYTE P., Jr., (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. Harry Harmon Insulation
511 So. 2d 690 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
476 So. 2d 789, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2364, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keene-corp-v-bahl-fladistctapp-1985.