Keenan v. Perrault

57 A. 335, 72 N.H. 426, 1904 N.H. LEXIS 33
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided February 2, 1904·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Walker, J.

As the trustee blank in the writ was filled out with a fictitious name, with no intention of havmg it served as a *427 trustee writ, and as it was not in fact served upon a trustee, the action was not “ began by trustee process ” within the meaning of section 1, chapter 245, Public Statutes. Clement v. Clement, 18 N. H. 611; Cole v. Smith, 61 N. H. 642. It is as though the trustee part of the writ had been left entirely blank, in which case-the officer would have performed his duty by serving it as a writ of summons and attachment. P. S., e. 219, s. 2; Laws 1893,. c. 67, s. 6. The order dismissing the action, therefore, on the ground that it was begun by trustee process, was error.

Exception sustained.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keenan v. Perrault, 57 A. 335, 72 N.H. 426, 1904 N.H. LEXIS 33 (N.H. 1904).

57 A. 335 (Keenan v. Perrault) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lacoss v. Lebanon
101 A. 364 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1917)