Keenan v. Milk

166 A.D. 935, 151 N.Y.S. 1123, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6938

This text of 166 A.D. 935 (Keenan v. Milk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keenan v. Milk, 166 A.D. 935, 151 N.Y.S. 1123, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6938 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

The matters alleged in the “first separate defense” in the answer of defendant Morris Milk do not constitute a defense to the cause of action set forth in the complaint. These matters were provable under the denials of the answer, and it was not proper pleading to set them up as an affirmative defense. Therefore, the motion of plaintiff to sustain his demurrer to these matters when pleaded as a defense should have been granted. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A.D. 935, 151 N.Y.S. 1123, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keenan-v-milk-nyappdiv-1915.