Keenan v. Martin
265 A.D. 981, 38 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6813
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 1942·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., concurs solely upon the ground that mandamus may not be resorted to in matters of this kind. The petitioner is entitled to a total of seventeen and one-half days per month as compensation and commutation. (People ex rel. Hammond v. Martin, 261 App. Div. 648.) [See post, p. 1029.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Keenan v. Martin, 265 A.D. 981, 38 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
265 A.D. 981 (Keenan v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Quinn v. Jackson
270 A.D. 1060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)