Keenan v. Martin
265 A.D. 981, 38 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6813
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 29, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 265 A.D. 981 (Keenan v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Keenan v. Martin, 265 A.D. 981, 38 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
Opinion
Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., concurs solely upon the ground that mandamus may not be resorted to in matters of this kind. The petitioner is entitled to a total of seventeen and one-half days per month as compensation and commutation. (People ex rel. Hammond v. Martin, 261 App. Div. 648.) [See post, p. 1029.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Quinn v. Jackson
270 A.D. 1060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 981, 38 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keenan-v-martin-nyappdiv-1942.