Keenan v. Maass

923 P.2d 1200, 324 Or. 230, 1996 Ore. LEXIS 104
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided October 8, 1996·No. CC 94-C-11097; CA A84950; SC S43465·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in the light of Billings v. Gates, 323 Or 167, 916 P2d 291 (1996).

Fadeley, J., would not allow petition for review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keenan v. Maass, 923 P.2d 1200, 324 Or. 230, 1996 Ore. LEXIS 104 (Or. 1996).

923 P.2d 1200 (Keenan v. Maass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dunn v. Hill
156 P.3d 72 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
Andrews v. R.W. Hays Co.
998 P.2d 774 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)
Keenan v. Maass
945 P.2d 526 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1997)