Keenan v. Maass

923 P.2d 1200, 324 Or. 230, 1996 Ore. LEXIS 104
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 8, 1996
DocketCC 94-C-11097; CA A84950; SC S43465
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 923 P.2d 1200 (Keenan v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keenan v. Maass, 923 P.2d 1200, 324 Or. 230, 1996 Ore. LEXIS 104 (Or. 1996).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in the light of Billings v. Gates, 323 Or 167, 916 P2d 291 (1996).

Fadeley, J., would not allow petition for review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunn v. Hill
156 P.3d 72 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
Andrews v. R.W. Hays Co.
998 P.2d 774 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)
Keenan v. Maass
945 P.2d 526 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
923 P.2d 1200, 324 Or. 230, 1996 Ore. LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keenan-v-maass-or-1996.