Keenan v. Keenan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Keenan v. Keenan

151 A.D.2d 483, 542 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7475

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 5, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 151 A.D.2d 483 (Keenan v. Keenan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keenan v. Keenan, 151 A.D.2d 483, 542 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7475 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In a support proceeding pursuant to Domestic Relations Law article 3-A the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), dated January 27, 1988, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the assertions of the petitioner husband, the Family Court properly dismissed his petition for support upon determining that the respondent wife — who supports the parties’ three children with limited income — lacks the financial ability to support him as well (see, Domestic Relations Law §32).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Kooper, J. P., Spatt, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a support proceeding pursuant to Domestic Relations Law article 3-A the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), dated January 27, 1988, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the assertions of the petitioner husband, the Family Court properly dismissed his petition for support upon determining that the respondent wife — who supports the parties’ three children with limited income — lacks the financial ability to support him as well (see, Domestic Relations Law §32).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Kooper, J. P., Spatt, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 A.D.2d 483, 542 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keenan-v-keenan-nyappdiv-1989.