Keenan v. Commissioners of New Hanover County

85 S.E. 5, 169 N.C. 246, 1915 N.C. LEXIS 191
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 22, 1915·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

This is a petition to rehear the above cause, reported 167 N. C., 357. On the trial the court permitted the introduction of a judgment roll in the case of Thomas J. Keenan v. City of Wilmington and Louisa Gr. Wright.

We hold that the said judgment roll was not competent evidence for the purpose of locating the division line between the plaintiff’s land and *247 that of the defendant Rhodes, it appearing that Rhodes was not a party to the said action and not bound by the judgment.

Such judgment is not competent for the purpose of estopping Rhodes in locating the division line between him and the plaintiff. If it is to be used as a mere link in the plaintiff’s chain of title, it is competent for that purpose.

The petition to rehear is

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keenan v. Commissioners of New Hanover County, 85 S.E. 5, 169 N.C. 246, 1915 N.C. LEXIS 191 (N.C. 1915).

85 S.E. 5 (Keenan v. Commissioners of New Hanover County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hanes v. . Utilities Co.
131 S.E. 402 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
Hanes v. Southern Public Utilities Co.
191 N.C. 13 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)