Keenan v. Board of Parole
This text of 834 P.2d 546 (Keenan v. Board of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order denying him parole. Because petitioner has exhausted his administrative remedies, we have jurisdiction to review. Owens v. Board of Parole, 113 Or App 507, 834 P2d 547 (1992.)
Petitioner argues that the Board erred in finding aggravating factor O, consecutive sentences, because his consecutive sentences already include murder. ORS 144.079(2).1 We agree that ORS 144.079 and, therefore, factor 0, do not apply. Plane v. Board of Parole, 114 Or App 60, 834 P2d 549 (1992). Petitioner’s other arguments are without merit.
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
834 P.2d 546, 114 Or. App. 414, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keenan-v-board-of-parole-orctapp-1992.