Keen v. State

158 S.E. 611, 43 Ga. App. 331, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 339
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 13, 1931·No. 21348·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Broyles, 0. J.

1. There being evidence that the defendant admitted that the whisky found in a certain building was his whisky, the failure of the court “to charge the law with reference to joint possession of the building” was not error.

2. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, the failure of the judge to charge the law of confessions is not error, in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request.

3. The remaining special ground of the motion for a new trial shows no cause for a reversal of the judgment.

4. The evidence amply supported the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keen v. State, 158 S.E. 611, 43 Ga. App. 331, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 339 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

158 S.E. 611 (Keen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scudiere v. State
203 S.E.2d 581 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Staggers v. State
114 S.E.2d 142 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Kemp v. State
6 S.E.2d 196 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Screws v. State
199 S.E. 61 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Turner v. State
169 S.E. 733 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)