Keen v. Jason

11 A.D.2d 1039, 207 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7861
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 10, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to restrain defendant from the practice of urology in alleged competition with plaintiff within a certain area of Suffolk County, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 20, 1959, dismissing his complaint after a nonjury trial. The trier of the fact found that the written employment agreement, containing the restrictive clause invoked by plaintiff, was made by the parties herein, who are physicians, but that such agreement had been abrogated and superseded by a subsequent oral agreement of partnership which was effectuated by certain acts and which was established by documents reflecting partnership transactions. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur. [19 Misc 2d 538.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keen v. Jason, 11 A.D.2d 1039, 207 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

11 A.D.2d 1039 (Keen v. Jason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Missan v. Schoenfeld
95 A.D.2d 198 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)