Keen v. Jason

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Keen v. Jason

11 A.D.2d 1039, 207 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7861

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 10, 1960

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 A.D.2d 1039 (Keen v. Jason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keen v. Jason, 11 A.D.2d 1039, 207 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to restrain defendant from the practice of urology in alleged competition with plaintiff within a certain area of Suffolk County, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 20, 1959, dismissing his complaint after a nonjury trial. The trier of the fact found that the written employment agreement, containing the restrictive clause invoked by plaintiff, was made by the parties herein, who are physicians, but that such agreement had been abrogated and superseded by a subsequent oral agreement of partnership which was effectuated by certain acts and which was established by documents reflecting partnership transactions. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur. [19 Misc 2d 538.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to restrain defendant from the practice of urology in alleged competition with plaintiff within a certain area of Suffolk County, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 20, 1959, dismissing his complaint after a nonjury trial. The trier of the fact found that the written employment agreement, containing the restrictive clause invoked by plaintiff, was made by the parties herein, who are physicians, but that such agreement had been abrogated and superseded by a subsequent oral agreement of partnership which was effectuated by certain acts and which was established by documents reflecting partnership transactions. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur. [19 Misc 2d 538.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 1039, 207 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keen-v-jason-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack