Keen v. Hopkins

48 Pa. 445, 1865 Pa. LEXIS 28
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 16, 1865
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 48 Pa. 445 (Keen v. Hopkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keen v. Hopkins, 48 Pa. 445, 1865 Pa. LEXIS 28 (Pa. 1865).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered, by

Agnew, J.

— It would be sufficient for this case to say it is affirmed, because not a single error has been assigned, according to the rules of this court.

But not to pass the principal point without notice, we may say that great discretion should be allowmd to the courts below, in putting into form and amending verdicts.

[446]*446Where the court has any elements from which it can fairly expound the verdict, and carry out its substantial finding, we are not disposed to scrutinize its exercise of the power of amendment with much nicety.

Judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones Et Ux. v. Stiffler
8 A.2d 455 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Emblem Oil Co. v. Taylor
179 A. 773 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Commonwealth v. Fronheiser
6 Pa. D. & C. 710 (Bucks County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1925)
Capece v. Bushinski
2 Pa. D. & C. 197 (Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, 1922)
S. Austin Bicking Paper Manufacturing Co. v. Worrall
74 Pa. Super. 242 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Haller v. Haller
45 Pa. Super. 409 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
Clouser v. Patterson
15 A. 444 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Pa. 445, 1865 Pa. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keen-v-hopkins-pa-1865.