Keen v. Hiatt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Keen v. Hiatt

1915 OK 1063, 153 P. 861, 54 Okla. 130, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1282

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 14, 1915

Docket6404

StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK 1063 (Keen v. Hiatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keen v. Hiatt, 1915 OK 1063, 153 P. 861, 54 Okla. 130, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1282 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A motion has been filed to dismiss this appeal, because it does not affirmatively appear from the record that the order extending the time to make and serve a case was filed in the lower court, and the motion is supported by the affidavit of the clerk of the court that such orders were never filed in the trial court. This motion must be sustained on the authority of Town of Okemah v. Allen, 48 Okla. 757, 150 Pac. 669.

We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A motion has been filed to dismiss this appeal, because it does not affirmatively appear from the record that the order extending the time to make and serve a case was filed in the lower court, and the motion is supported by the affidavit of the clerk of the court that such orders were never filed in the trial court. This motion must be sustained on the authority of Town of Okemah v. Allen, 48 Okla. 757, 150 Pac. 669.

We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered'.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK 1063, 153 P. 861, 54 Okla. 130, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keen-v-hiatt-okla-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack