Keen v. Hiatt
1915 OK 1063, 153 P. 861, 54 Okla. 130, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1282
Opinion
A motion has been filed to dismiss this appeal, because it does not affirmatively appear from the record that the order extending the time to make and serve a case was filed in the lower court, and the motion is supported by the affidavit of the clerk of the court that such orders were never filed in the trial court. This motion must be sustained on the authority of Town of Okemah v. Allen, 48 Okla. 757, 150 Pac. 669.
We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.
By the Court: It is so ordered'.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Keen v. Hiatt, 1915 OK 1063, 153 P. 861, 54 Okla. 130, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1282 (Okla. 1915).
1915 OK 1063 (Keen v. Hiatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Town of Okemah v. Allen
150 P. 669 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)