Keen v. Eaby

254 Pa. 273
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 28, 1916·No. Appeal, No. 338·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of tfie learned president judge of tfie court below denying a new trial and refusing judgment for. tfie defendant non obstante veredicto.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keen v. Eaby, 254 Pa. 273 (Pa. 1916).

254 Pa. 273 (Keen v. Eaby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Estate of Warner
446 A.2d 293 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Wood v. Evanitzsky
79 A.2d 213 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Snyder's Executors v. Koser
53 Pa. D. & C. 410 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 1945)
Bosler v. Sun Oil Company
191 A. 718 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Byrne v. Williams
11 Pa. D. & C. 415 (Greene County Court of Common Pleas, 1928)
Mylin v. Hetrick
82 Pa. Super. 475 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)