Keels v. Crosswell
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This action involves the construction of a deed. Under the authorities cited by him, especially Clinkscales v. Clinkscales, 91 S. C., 59, 74 S. E., 121, Egan v. Touchberry, 93 S. C., 569, 77 S. E., 706, and Sandford v. Sandford, 106 S. C., 304, 91 S. E., 294, where the deeds construed were very similar to the one before us, Judge Greene was unquestionably correct in holding that a fee-simple estate was conveyed to D. W. Keels, which the grantor could not thereafter limit or cut down. The demurrer to defendant’s answer, therefore, was properly sustained. Let the decree be reported.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
185 S.E. 39 (Keels v. Crosswell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.