Keels v. Crosswell

185 S.E. 39, 180 S.C. 63, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 103
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 6, 1936·No. 14270·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Stabrer.

This action involves the construction of a deed. Under the authorities cited by him, especially Clinkscales v. Clinkscales, 91 S. C., 59, 74 S. E., 121, Egan v. Touchberry, 93 S. C., 569, 77 S. E., 706, and Sandford v. Sandford, 106 S. C., 304, 91 S. E., 294, where the deeds construed were very similar to the one before us, Judge Greene was unquestionably correct in holding that a fee-simple estate was conveyed to D. W. Keels, which the grantor could not thereafter limit or cut down. The demurrer to defendant’s answer, therefore, was properly sustained. Let the decree be reported.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Messrs Justices Carter, Bonham, Baker and Fishburne concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keels v. Crosswell, 185 S.E. 39, 180 S.C. 63, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 103 (S.C. 1936).

185 S.E. 39 (Keels v. Crosswell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glasgow v. Glasgow
70 S.E.2d 432 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1952)
Cresswell v. Bank of Greenwood
41 S.E.2d 393 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1947)
United States v. 31,600 Acres of Land
47 F. Supp. 21 (E.D. South Carolina, 1942)