Keels v. Crosswell
This text of 185 S.E. 39 (Keels v. Crosswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This action involves the construction of a deed. Under the authorities cited by him, especially Clinkscales v. Clinkscales, 91 S. C., 59, 74 S. E., 121, Egan v. Touchberry, 93 S. C., 569, 77 S. E., 706, and Sandford v. Sandford, 106 S. C., 304, 91 S. E., 294, where the deeds construed were very similar to the one before us, Judge Greene was unquestionably correct in holding that a fee-simple estate was conveyed to D. W. Keels, which the grantor could not thereafter limit or cut down. The demurrer to defendant’s answer, therefore, was properly sustained. Let the decree be reported.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 S.E. 39, 180 S.C. 63, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keels-v-crosswell-sc-1936.