Keels v. Crosswell

185 S.E. 39, 180 S.C. 63, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 103
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedApril 6, 1936
Docket14270
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 185 S.E. 39 (Keels v. Crosswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keels v. Crosswell, 185 S.E. 39, 180 S.C. 63, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 103 (S.C. 1936).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Stabrer.

This action involves the construction of a deed. Under the authorities cited by him, especially Clinkscales v. Clinkscales, 91 S. C., 59, 74 S. E., 121, Egan v. Touchberry, 93 S. C., 569, 77 S. E., 706, and Sandford v. Sandford, 106 S. C., 304, 91 S. E., 294, where the deeds construed were very similar to the one before us, Judge Greene was unquestionably correct in holding that a fee-simple estate was conveyed to D. W. Keels, which the grantor could not thereafter limit or cut down. The demurrer to defendant’s answer, therefore, was properly sustained. Let the decree be reported.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Messrs Justices Carter, Bonham, Baker and Fishburne concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glasgow v. Glasgow
70 S.E.2d 432 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1952)
Cresswell v. Bank of Greenwood
41 S.E.2d 393 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1947)
United States v. 31,600 Acres of Land
47 F. Supp. 21 (E.D. South Carolina, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 S.E. 39, 180 S.C. 63, 1936 S.C. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keels-v-crosswell-sc-1936.