KEELLINGS v. Vallery
This text of 952 So. 2d 1289 (KEELLINGS v. Vallery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James KEELLINGS, et al., Appellants,
v.
Mark VALLERY, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Margaret A. Wharton of Margaret A. Wharton, P.A., Oviedo, for Appellants.
James R. Lussier of Mateer Harbert, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises two points on appeal. First, he disputes the propriety of the lower court's summary judgment that dismissed Mark Vallery as a party. Second, he challenges a partial summary judgment adjudicating certain factual issues in claims that remain pending against other parties. We affirm the summary judgment that dismissed Vallery. As to Appellant's second point, we dismiss the appeal because it is premature.
AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
TORPY, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
952 So. 2d 1289, 2007 WL 1093483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keellings-v-vallery-fladistctapp-2007.