KEELLINGS v. Vallery

952 So. 2d 1289, 2007 WL 1093483
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 2007·No. 5D05-4493·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

952 So.2d 1289 (2007)

James KEELLINGS, et al., Appellants,
v.
Mark VALLERY, Appellee.

No. 5D05-4493.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 13, 2007.

Margaret A. Wharton of Margaret A. Wharton, P.A., Oviedo, for Appellants.

James R. Lussier of Mateer Harbert, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two points on appeal. First, he disputes the propriety of the lower court's summary judgment that dismissed Mark Vallery as a party. Second, he challenges a partial summary judgment adjudicating certain factual issues in claims that remain pending against other parties. We affirm the summary judgment that dismissed Vallery. As to Appellant's second point, we dismiss the appeal because it is premature.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

TORPY, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KEELLINGS v. Vallery, 952 So. 2d 1289, 2007 WL 1093483 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

952 So. 2d 1289 (KEELLINGS v. Vallery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hollander v. Crowder
952 So. 2d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)