Keeler v. Poughkeepsie & Salt Point Plank Road Co.
This text of 10 How. Pr. 11 (Keeler v. Poughkeepsie & Salt Point Plank Road Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I think the motion must be denied, for two reasons. If the defendants’ answer is true, the trial will not involve the examination of any account; and defendant at least must be held bound by his own allegations.
But even if the plaintiff’s view of the case is correct, before it can be established, that issue is to be tried, and then, if decided in the plaintiff’s favor, it may be necessary to examine the accounts of the parties. If that issue is found for the defendants, then no accounts are to be examined. A reference can only be compelled where the court can see by the pleadings, or other papers of the parties, that the trial of the cause must necessarily involve the examination of a long account on either side. The cause must, therefore, retain its place on the calendar, unless the parties can agree to a reference.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 How. Pr. 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keeler-v-poughkeepsie-salt-point-plank-road-co-nysupct-1854.