Keeler v. Gwynn

Fourth Circuit

Keeler v. Gwynn

629 F. App'x 578

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 19, 2016·No. No. 15-2256·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hieda A. Keeler appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil rights complaint. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Keeler's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Keeler has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hieda A. Keeler appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil rights complaint. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Keeler's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Keeler has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Keeler v. Gwynn, 629 F. App'x 578 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

629 F. App'x 578 (Keeler v. Gwynn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.