Keeler v. Barrett's, Palmer & Heal Dyeing Establishment
22 Jones & S. 555
This text of 22 Jones & S. 555 (Keeler v. Barrett's, Palmer & Heal Dyeing Establishment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Keeler v. Barrett's, Palmer & Heal Dyeing Establishment, 22 Jones & S. 555 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1886).
Opinion
“The appeal being from the judgment only, and no appeal having been taken from the denial of the motion for a new trial, the verdict of the jury must stand as conclusive upon the questions of fact sought to be raised by the points submitted on behalf of the appellant. Judgment affirmed, with costs.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
22 Jones & S. 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keeler-v-barretts-palmer-heal-dyeing-establishment-nysuperctnyc-1886.