Keel v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Keel v. State

295 N.E.2d 612, 260 Ind. 333, 1973 Ind. LEXIS 531

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 8, 1973

DocketNo. 271S54

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 295 N.E.2d 612 (Keel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keel v. State, 295 N.E.2d 612, 260 Ind. 333, 1973 Ind. LEXIS 531 (Ind. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Arterburn, C.J.

This is an appeal from a conviction for theft of property in excess of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00). There has been a motion to dismiss filed by the state which contends, primarily, that the transcript and brief do not conform to the Rules of this court. Certain other technical errors are also claimed. In answer to the motion, the appellant claims that he only raises one issue, namely “that the state either properly proved value under the law, or it did not” and that the record herein is sufficient for our review of that point. We are inclined to review a case on the merits if possible and therefore the motion to dismiss is overruled and we now order the state to file an answer brief on the point presented within thirty (30) days.

All Justices concur.

Note.—Reported in 295 N. E. 2d 612.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arterburn, C.J.

This is an appeal from a conviction for theft of property in excess of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00). There has been a motion to dismiss filed by the state which contends, primarily, that the transcript and brief do not conform to the Rules of this court. Certain other technical errors are also claimed. In answer to the motion, the appellant claims that he only raises one issue, namely “that the state either properly proved value under the law, or it did not” and that the record herein is sufficient for our review of that point. We are inclined to review a case on the merits if possible and therefore the motion to dismiss is overruled and we now order the state to file an answer brief on the point presented within thirty (30) days.

All Justices concur.

Note.—Reported in 295 N. E. 2d 612.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 N.E.2d 612, 260 Ind. 333, 1973 Ind. LEXIS 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keel-v-state-ind-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack