Keel v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Keel v. State

547 So. 2d 527, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 348, 1989 WL 75008

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 16, 1989

Docket88-968

StatusPublished

This text of 547 So. 2d 527 (Keel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keel v. State, 547 So. 2d 527, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 348, 1989 WL 75008 (Ala. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner has not complied with Rule 39(k), A.R.App.P., and no opinion was issued by the Court of Criminal Appeals. On the authority of Ex parte Save Our [528]*528Streams, Inc., 541 So.2d 549 (Ala.1989), we will not issue the writ of certiorari, and we express no opinion regarding the merits of the petitioner’s claims.

WRIT DENIED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, ALMON, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner has not complied with Rule 39(k), A.R.App.P., and no opinion was issued by the Court of Criminal Appeals. On the authority of Ex parte Save Our [528]*528Streams, Inc., 541 So.2d 549 (Ala.1989), we will not issue the writ of certiorari, and we express no opinion regarding the merits of the petitioner’s claims.

WRIT DENIED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, ALMON, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 So. 2d 527, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 348, 1989 WL 75008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keel-v-state-ala-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack