Keel v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Keel v. State

547 So. 2d 527, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 348, 1989 WL 75008

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 16, 1989·No. 88-968·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner has not complied with Rule 39(k), A.R.App.P., and no opinion was issued by the Court of Criminal Appeals. On the authority of Ex parte Save Our [528]*528Streams, Inc., 541 So.2d 549 (Ala.1989), we will not issue the writ of certiorari, and we express no opinion regarding the merits of the petitioner’s claims.

WRIT DENIED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, ALMON, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner has not complied with Rule 39(k), A.R.App.P., and no opinion was issued by the Court of Criminal Appeals. On the authority of Ex parte Save Our [528]*528Streams, Inc., 541 So.2d 549 (Ala.1989), we will not issue the writ of certiorari, and we express no opinion regarding the merits of the petitioner’s claims.

WRIT DENIED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, ALMON, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Keel v. State, 547 So. 2d 527, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 348, 1989 WL 75008 (Ala. 1989).

Pincite

547 So. 2d 527 (Keel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related