Keel v. Keel

1929 OK 381, 280 P. 815, 138 Okla. 243, 1929 Okla. LEXIS 540
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 24, 1929·No. 19102·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an attempt to ap peal from a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county.

The petition in error was filed in this court January 23, 1928; no case-made or transcript presenting the record of the trial court is attached to the petition in error filed in this court, nor is there any attempt to bring the record of the trial court before this court for review. The filing of the petition in error in this court without a case-made or transcript of the record attached thereto is not sufficient to authorize the Supreme Court to review any of the errors alleged, and the proceedings will be dismissed. Callahan v. Callahan, 47 Okla. 542, 149 Pac. 135; Denny v. Wright & O’Rourke, 13 Okla. 256, 74 Pac. 104. The record of the trial court not having been presented to this court, there i,s nothing before this court for review, and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keel v. Keel, 1929 OK 381, 280 P. 815, 138 Okla. 243, 1929 Okla. LEXIS 540 (Okla. 1929).

1929 OK 381 (Keel v. Keel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banta v. Banta
1950 OK 286 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1950)