Keegle v. County of Hudson
130 A. 919, 102 N.J.L. 219, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 317
This text of 130 A. 919 (Keegle v. County of Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Keegle v. County of Hudson, 130 A. 919, 102 N.J.L. 219, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 317 (N.J. 1925).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for tiie reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rozmierski v. City of Newark
125 A.2d 747 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Winne v. County of Bergen
121 A.2d 733 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1956)
De Marco v. BD., CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, BERGEN CTY.
115 A.2d 635 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
130 A. 919, 102 N.J.L. 219, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keegle-v-county-of-hudson-nj-1925.