Keegle v. County of Hudson
130 A. 919, 102 N.J.L. 219, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 317
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for tiie reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Keegle v. County of Hudson, 130 A. 919, 102 N.J.L. 219, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 317 (N.J. 1925).
130 A. 919 (Keegle v. County of Hudson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rozmierski v. City of Newark
125 A.2d 747 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Winne v. County of Bergen
121 A.2d 733 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1956)
De Marco v. BD., CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, BERGEN CTY.
115 A.2d 635 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)