Keegan v. Tritschler
This text of 43 A.D.2d 855 (Keegan v. Tritschler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a consolidated negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiffs Keegan and Kennedy appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 13, 1969, upon -a special verdict of a jury at a trial of the issues of liability only, dismissing their complaint against defendants Conran and Finneran. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts, and, as between appellants and said defendants, action severed and new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. In our opinion, the jury’s finding that appellants were [856]*856contributorily negligent was contrary to the weight of the evidence (see Burnell V. La Fountain, 6 A D 2d 586). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Christ, .Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 A.D.2d 855, 351 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keegan-v-tritschler-nyappdiv-1974.