Keegan v. Seeth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Keegan v. Seeth

251 A.D. 829, 297 N.Y.S. 692, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7861

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 7, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 829 (Keegan v. Seeth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keegan v. Seeth, 251 A.D. 829, 297 N.Y.S. 692, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to enforce an alleged partnership with a decedent and for an accounting. Interlocutory judgment that plaintiff was a partner of the decedent and referring the taking of an account to an official referee reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed dismissing the complaint, with costs. The finding that a partnership existed is contrary to the credible evidence in this record, part of which is in documentary form, and which evidence requires a finding that there was no partnership such as claimed by plaintiff. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to enforce an alleged partnership with a decedent and for an accounting. Interlocutory judgment that plaintiff was a partner of the decedent and referring the taking of an account to an official referee reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed dismissing the complaint, with costs. The finding that a partnership existed is contrary to the credible evidence in this record, part of which is in documentary form, and which evidence requires a finding that there was no partnership such as claimed by plaintiff. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 829, 297 N.Y.S. 692, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keegan-v-seeth-nyappdiv-1937.