Keefer v. Union County

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Keefer v. Union County

61 A. 1021, 212 Pa. 520, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 652

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 22, 1905

DocketAppeal, No. 323

StatusPublished

This text of 61 A. 1021 (Keefer v. Union County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keefer v. Union County, 61 A. 1021, 212 Pa. 520, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 652 (Pa. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

The sixty-three assignments of error raise no question of law which requires discussion. The controversy in the case was whether the work done by plaintiff was outside of his contract and if so whether it was done on the order of the county commissioners. The jury found the facts in his favor, and the court, [521]*521after a very careful review, required a remittitur from plaintiff as to certain items and approved the verdict as thus modified. We find no error in his conclusion.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

The sixty-three assignments of error raise no question of law which requires discussion. The controversy in the case was whether the work done by plaintiff was outside of his contract and if so whether it was done on the order of the county commissioners. The jury found the facts in his favor, and the court, [521]*521after a very careful review, required a remittitur from plaintiff as to certain items and approved the verdict as thus modified. We find no error in his conclusion.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A. 1021, 212 Pa. 520, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keefer-v-union-county-pa-1905.