Kedy Johnson v. the State of Texas

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 4, 2024
• Docket: 01-24-00313-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Opinion issued June 4, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00313-CR ——————————— KEDY JOHNSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 209th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1714118

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Kedy Johnson, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s March

6, 2024 Judgment of Conviction by Court. The court’s records reflect that appellant

did not timely file a motion for new trial. Accordingly, any notice of appeal was due

to be filed with the trial court within thirty days after the entry of the final judgment, on or before April 5, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). Appellant’s notice of

appeal was untimely filed on April 22, 2024.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke an appellate court’s

jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Lair

v. State, 321 S.W.3d 158, 159 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2010, pet. ref’d). If

a notice of appeal is not timely filed, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction to address

the merits of the case and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. See

Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

Notably however, the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure allow for an

extension of time to file a notice of appeal where the appellant, within fifteen days

of the deadline to file the notice of appeal: (a) files the notice of appeal in the trial

court and (b) files a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, complying

with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b), with the appellate court. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 26.3. Provided the extension of time prescribed by the rules, appellant

was required to file both his notice of appeal with the trial court and a motion for

extension of time to file a notice of appeal with this Court on or before April 22,

2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a).

Appellant’s notice of appeal, filed on April 22, 2024, was therefore filed

within the extended period provided by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3.

However, while appellant filed a “Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of

2 Appeal,” his motion was not filed with this Court until April 23, 2024. Accordingly,

appellant failed to file both his notice of appeal in the trial court and his motion to

extend time to file his notice of appeal with this Court within the extended period

provided by Rule 26.3. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2, 26.3. This Court has no authority

to allow the late filing of a notice of appeal except as provided by Rule 26.3. 1 See

Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522.

Absent a timely filed notice of appeal, we lack jurisdiction and cannot

consider the merits of appellant’s appeal. See Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522; Castillo v.

State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 202 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (concluding filing notice of

appeal and motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal one day late was

“enough to deprive the appellate court of jurisdiction”).

Accordingly, we deny appellant’s motion for extension to file his notice of

appeal and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f).

We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

1 In civil cases, the Texas Supreme Court has held that a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal may be implied where a party files its notice of appeal within the fifteen-day window allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). However, this “implied” motion for extension to file a notice of appeal has not been adopted by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and does not apply in criminal appeals. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Lair v. State, 321 S.W.3d 158, 160 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2010, pet. ref’d) (Sharp, J., concurring) (concurring in dismissal of appeal for lack of jurisdiction because of untimely filed notice of appeal, “but writ[ing] separately to encourage the adoption of the holding of Verburgt to late-filed notices of appeal in criminal cases”).

3 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).