Keck v. Woodring

1946 OK 308, 174 P.2d 248, 197 Okla. 663, 1946 Okla. LEXIS 644
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Keck v. Woodring. Read the opinion of the Court — 201 Okla. 665
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 12, 1946·No. No. 32571·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was commenced by Robert Woodring, a minor, by his father and next friend, against G. E. Keck to recover for personal injuries. On November 5, 1945, the cause was dismissed for want of prosecution. On December 21, 1945, plaintiff filed his motion to reinstate the cause, and thereupon the court entered its order on January 21, 1946, setting aside the order dismissing the cause and reinstating the cause. A motion to dismiss the appeal has been filed.

The motion to dismiss the appeal must be sustained. In Haywood v. Pinkey, 112 Okla. 30, 239 P. 456, we stated that an order sustaining a motion to set aside a dismissal of a cause of action and reinstating the same is not a final order and that no appeal can be taken therefrom prior to a final determination of the case. To the same effect see Madison v. Trekell, 179 Okla. 65, 64 P. 2d 711.

The appeal is dismissed.

GIBSON, C.J., HURST, V.C.J., and OSBORN, CORN, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keck v. Woodring, 1946 OK 308, 174 P.2d 248, 197 Okla. 663, 1946 Okla. LEXIS 644 (Okla. 1946).

1946 OK 308 (Keck v. Woodring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Madison v. Trekell
1937 OK 44 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937)
Haygood v. Pinkey
1925 OK 690 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)