Keck v. Michigan Quartz Silica Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Keck v. Michigan Quartz Silica Co.

149 N.W. 208, 158 Wis. 500, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 335

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 27, 1914

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 149 N.W. 208 (Keck v. Michigan Quartz Silica Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keck v. Michigan Quartz Silica Co., 149 N.W. 208, 158 Wis. 500, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 335 (Wis. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Winslow, C. J.

This judgment must be affirmed, because (1) it does not appear that the findings of fact of the civil court are against the clear preponderance of the evidence (Pabst B. Co. v. Milwaukee L. Co. 156 Wis. 615, 146 N. W. 879), and (2) the continued maintenance by the plaintiff of his office in the Railway Exchange Building after the passage of the resolution of November 18, 1909, was sufficient consideration for the promise contained in the resolution.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winslow, C. J.

This judgment must be affirmed, because (1) it does not appear that the findings of fact of the civil court are against the clear preponderance of the evidence (Pabst B. Co. v. Milwaukee L. Co. 156 Wis. 615, 146 N. W. 879), and (2) the continued maintenance by the plaintiff of his office in the Railway Exchange Building after the passage of the resolution of November 18, 1909, was sufficient consideration for the promise contained in the resolution.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 N.W. 208, 158 Wis. 500, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keck-v-michigan-quartz-silica-co-wis-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack