Kechinyere Franca Azaga v. Houston Housing Authority
Opinion
Opinion issued January 21, 2016
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond.1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Higley, Huddle, and Lloyd.
1 Appellant filed a motion, stating he was requesting a hearing on the filing fee and pauper’s oath, but no affidavit of indigence was attached. Appellant filed additional letters, reminding us of his request for a hearing. No affidavit of indigence or other document complying with TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 has been filed even though our notices referenced Rule 20.1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kechinyere Franca Azaga v. Houston Housing Authority (Kechinyere Franca Azaga v. Houston Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.