Keaton v. McDonald

24 Ga. 166
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 Ga. 166 (Keaton v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keaton v. McDonald, 24 Ga. 166 (Ga. 1858).

Opinion

Benning, J.

By the Court. delivering the opinion.

The right to issue such a -warrant as this depends solely upon the Act of 1S11, “to regulate the collection of rent.” Before that Act, no Judge, or Justice of the Peace, or Court, had the right. The right, then, that exists, is just such as the Act creates, — neither more nor less. The Act says, that the warrant is to be obtained from “ any Justice of the Peace within the district where” the tenant resides; and it does not say, that the warrant is to be obtained from any one else. It must follow, then, that the Act does not confer the right upon any Justice of tlie Inferior Court. Cobb Big. 900; 15 6a. 113.

The remedy provided by the Act is a summary one. 7 6a. JR. 53.

Even when thus restricted, the remedy is a very extensive one, — so extensive that it will hardly be possible for. a case to arise, that will not be within it.

We think, therefore, that the Court below did right in dismissing the warrant upon the first ground of the motion.

It is unnecessary to express an opinion on the second ground.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woolsey v. Lawshe
57 S.E. 1039 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Ga. 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keaton-v-mcdonald-ga-1858.