Keating v. McGivney

Idaho Supreme Court

Keating v. McGivney

218 P. 791, 37 Idaho 797, 1923 Ida. LEXIS 202

CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 4, 1923

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 218 P. 791 (Keating v. McGivney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keating v. McGivney, 218 P. 791, 37 Idaho 797, 1923 Ida. LEXIS 202 (Idaho 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

DUNN, J.

— The appeal in this case was dismissed for failure to file transcript in time, and petition for rehearing has been filed by appellant.

This case is in all respects similar to the case of Utana Mining Corp. v. Salmon River Power & Light Co., ante, [798]*798p. 793, 218 Pac. 789, and for the reasons stated in that opinion the petition for rehearing in this case is denied.

Budge, C. J., and McCarthy and William A. Lee, JJ., concur.

WM. E. LEE, J.

— I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Utana Mining Corp. v. Salmon River Power & Light Co., ante, p. 793, 218 Pac. 789.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI