Keating v. McGivney

218 P. 791, 37 Idaho 797, 1923 Ida. LEXIS 202
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided October 4, 1923·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DUNN, J.

— The appeal in this case was dismissed for failure to file transcript in time, and petition for rehearing has been filed by appellant.

This case is in all respects similar to the case of Utana Mining Corp. v. Salmon River Power & Light Co., ante, [798] p. 793, 218 Pac. 789, and for the reasons stated in that opinion the petition for rehearing in this case is denied.

Budge, C. J., and McCarthy and William A. Lee, JJ., concur.

WM. E. LEE, J.

— I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Utana Mining Corp. v. Salmon River Power & Light Co., ante, p. 793, 218 Pac. 789.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keating v. McGivney, 218 P. 791, 37 Idaho 797, 1923 Ida. LEXIS 202 (Idaho 1923).

218 P. 791 (Keating v. McGivney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Geist v. Moore
70 P.2d 403 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1937)
California Gulch Placer Mining Co. v. Patrick
218 P. 378 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1923)