Keating v. Keating

33 A.D.3d 867, 823 N.Y.S.2d 210
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 24, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 33 A.D.3d 867 (Keating v. Keating) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keating v. Keating, 33 A.D.3d 867, 823 N.Y.S.2d 210 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated January 28, [868]*8682005, which, upon a decision of the same court (Garvey, J.) dated October 30, 2004, made after a nonjury trial, inter alia, directed that child support and maintenance be paid as of November 1, 2004, rather than the commencement date of the action, awarded her the sum of only $2,748.96 per month in child support, and awarded the defendant a credit toward his child support obligation upon the commencement of his college tuition payments for the parties’ children, and the defendant cross-appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of the same judgment which, inter alia, awarded the plaintiff nondurational maintenance.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof awarding the defendant a credit toward his child support obligation upon the commencement of his college tuition payments for the parties’ children; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In view of the defendant’s appropriate concession, he is not entitled to a credit against child support for college tuition (see Lee v Lee, 18 AD3d 513 [2005]; cf. Rohrs v Rohrs, 297 AD2d 317, 318 [2002]).

The parties’ remaining contentions do not require further modification of the judgment. Miller, J.E, Crane, Santucci and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J.D.D. v. A.D.
2024 NY Slip Op 50111(U) (New York Supreme Court, Westchester County, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 A.D.3d 867, 823 N.Y.S.2d 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keating-v-keating-nyappdiv-2006.