Keating v. Conviser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Keating v. Conviser

219 A.D. 836

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1927

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 219 A.D. 836 (Keating v. Conviser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keating v. Conviser, 219 A.D. 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Order setting aside verdict and dismissing complaint, and judgment entered thereon, reversed upon the law, with costs, and verdict reinstated, with costs. We are of opinion that defendants’ letter of complaint was libelous per se, especially in view of defendants’ letter to plaintiff, written in advance of said libelous communication. If there were any doubt about the meaning of defendants’ letter of complaint, the question was for the jury. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order setting aside verdict and dismissing complaint, and judgment entered thereon, reversed upon the law, with costs, and verdict reinstated, with costs. We are of opinion that defendants’ letter of complaint was libelous per se, especially in view of defendants’ letter to plaintiff, written in advance of said libelous communication. If there were any doubt about the meaning of defendants’ letter of complaint, the question was for the jury. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 A.D. 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keating-v-conviser-nyappdiv-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack