Keating v. Conviser
219 A.D. 836
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1927·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order setting aside verdict and dismissing complaint, and judgment entered thereon, reversed upon the law, with costs, and verdict reinstated, with costs. We are of opinion that defendants’ letter of complaint was libelous per se, especially in view of defendants’ letter to plaintiff, written in advance of said libelous communication. If there were any doubt about the meaning of defendants’ letter of complaint, the question was for the jury. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Keating v. Conviser, 219 A.D. 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).
219 A.D. 836 (Keating v. Conviser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murray v. Cassirer
34 Misc. 2d 616 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Schieve v. Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Telephone Co.
126 N.E.2d 817 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1955)
Quina v. Robert's
16 So. 2d 558 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1944)