Keating v. Conviser
159 N.E. 680, 246 N.Y. 632, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 1027
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Keating v. Conviser, 159 N.E. 680, 246 N.Y. 632, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 1027 (N.Y. 1927).
159 N.E. 680 (Keating v. Conviser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fennell v. G.A.C. Finance Corp. of Baltimore No. 3
218 A.2d 492 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1966)
Murray v. Cassirer
34 Misc. 2d 616 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Schieve v. Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Telephone Co.
126 N.E.2d 817 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1955)
Voneye v. Turner
240 S.W.2d 588 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1951)
Neaton v. Lewis Apparel Stores, Inc.
267 A.D. 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)
Quina v. Robert's
16 So. 2d 558 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1944)